SpeakOut.com
 
Home News Opinion Issues Politics TakeAction Forum Links
 
Send This Article to a Friend    Printer-Friendly Version   

Should Trigger Locks Be Required By Law?

by Jenny Murphy
Wednesday, April 5, 2000

Last year, after a series of school shootings, the Senate and House both passed versions of a juvenile justice bill in an attempt to prevent future violent crimes. Both bills contained provisions requiring all new guns to be sold with trigger locks, but compromise legislation has been stalled by disagreement over a proposed waiting period for guns purchased at gun shows.

In March, when a Michigan first grader shot and killed a classmate with a gun found in his home, President Clinton argued that a trigger lock might have prevented the child from firing the gun. He urged Congress to end the impasse that has prevented legislation requiring trigger locks on all new guns. In response to this pressure, the House passed a non-binding resolution recommending discussion of a compromise bill.

On One Hand...

Requiring that all new handguns be sold with trigger locks is a common sense solution to the increasing number of tragic shootings involving children. While it's impossible to protect every child from gun violence, mandatory trigger locks would decrease the number of senseless accidents that occur when children get hold of an adult's gun. If there had been a lock on the gun that the first-grader in Michigan used to kill his classmate, the tragedy would have been averted.

On the Other Hand...

Responsible gun owners already take care to keep their guns locked and out of the reach of children. Requiring that all new guns be sold with trigger locks will have little effect, since the law cannot ensure that people will actually use the locks. The Clinton administration is using the tragic shooting of the 6-year old in Michigan to push mandatory trigger lock legislation, but such a law would not have saved the little girl who was shot by a classmate. The boy who shot her was living in a crack house with no responsible adult supervision, so it is unlikely that the gun's owner would have used a trigger lock even if his gun had been sold with one. Trigger locks are already available, and responsible gun owners use them; changing the law is not going to make irresponsible gun owners change their ways.

  • In 1996, even though there were around 80 million gun owners, there were only 44 accidental gun deaths for children under age 10.

  • Republican presidential nominee George W. Bush told reporters he would be willing to sign a law requiring that trigger locks be sold with all handguns, but added that he doubts it would reduce gun violence.

  • New York Gov. George Pataki has called for a series of gun-control measures in his state that include making trigger locks mandatory.

CBS, AP, Newsweek, National Rifle Association

 Surveys
 
 Agree
Trigger locks on all handguns will prevent accidental shootings and keep criminals from firing stolen guns. They are a vital safety tool and should be required by law.
 Disagree
Trigger locks are useless if gun owners don't use them. Making trigger locks mandatory will have no effect on criminals who use guns in an irresponsible manner.
 Audio
Gun Control: Violates Right to Bear Arms or Needed for Safety?
 Features
The Gun Commandments
U.S., Gunmaker Strike a Deal
 Organizations
Center To Prevent Handgun Violence
Medical College of Wisconsin Firearm Injury Center
National Firearms Association
National Rifle Association
 Perspectives
In the Wake of This Shooting
Trigger Lock Law Would be Unenforceable
 

Home | News | Opinion | Issues | Politics | TakeAction | Forum
Reproduction of material from any SpeakOut.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. Copyright © 2000 SpeakOut.com, all rights reserved.
SpeakOut.com 1225 I Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005 | 202-777-3100 | Fax 202-842-5822
info@speakoutfoundation.com
| Advertising information | Privacy and Use Policies