SpeakOut.com
 
Home News Opinion Issues Politics TakeAction Forum Links
 
Send This Article to a Friend    Printer-Friendly Version   

Does the U.S. Need a Single Food Safety Agency?

by Barbara McCuen
Thursday, February 3, 2000

Outbreaks of foodborne illness have been on the rise over the past decade. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report estimates that harmful bacteria in food causes 76 million cases of foodborne illness and 5,000 deaths a year.

While the U.S. food supply is touted as the safest in the world, changes in the way food is grown, processed, and transported make it easier for contaminated food to reach more people. For example, a single batch of tainted ground beef from one processing plant can end up in hamburger patties distributed all over the country.

The present food safety system is a patchwork of a dozen different federal agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Customs Service.

In 1998, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) urged Congress to establish a "unified, central framework for managing food safety programs" headed by a single individual. The NAS did not recommend a single agency to coordinate food safety.

The President's Council on Food Safety was established in August 1998 to strengthen and focus existing federal efforts to coordinate food safety policy and resources. The council opposes the creation of a single food safety agency.

On One Hand...

A unified agency would reduce the risk of foodborne illness in the U.S. With so many different governmental bodies regulating the food supply, one hand doesn't know what the other is doing. The current system was patched together over decades to respond to health threats from specific products. The agencies that oversee the current process are poorly coordinated, use their resources inefficiently and are slow to respond to outbreaks.

On the Other Hand...

The country needs a unified food policy, not a new agency. A coordinated approach to food safety that focuses on risk assessment, management and communications will better protect the public.

Rather than wasting valuable resources to create a new agency, the government should fund research focused on improved methods of detecting harmful bacteria, and controlling, reducing and eliminating them.

  • Foodborne diseases cause 76 million illnesses, 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths in the U.S. every year.

  • Campylobacter, a pathogen found in poultry, is the most common cause of foodborne illness.

  • The current food safety system is made up of a dozen federal agencies administering as many as 35 different laws.

  • Following numerous food scares in Europe, including mad cow disease in Great Britain and the discovery of dioxin contamination in livestock feed in Belgium, the European Union created a single, unified food safety agency.

Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Science in the Public Interest, American Meat Institute

 Surveys
 
 Agree
A single, unified food safety agency is needed to cope with the increasing incidence of food-related public health risks.
 Disagree
A unified agency would be too costly, duplicating the work already conducted by existing federal watchdogs.
 Documents
Draft Preliminary Food Safety Strategic Plan for Public Review
Food Safety From Farm to Table: A National Food Safety Initiative
Food Safety: U.S. Needs a Single Agency to Administer a Unified, Risk-Based Inspection System
Food-Related Illness and Death In the United States
Safe Food Act of 1999
 Features
A Crackdown On Bad Eggs
Consumer Groups Demand Single Food-Safety Agency
Poisoned Package
 Organizations
CSPI Food Safety
Food Safety
National Food Processors Association (NFPA) Public Policy Index
 Perspectives
Government Should Seek Nationally Uniform Standards, Not Single Food Safety Agency, Says NFPA
Introduction of the Safe Food Act of 1999
 

Home | News | Opinion | Issues | Politics | TakeAction | Forum
Reproduction of material from any SpeakOut.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. Copyright © 2000 SpeakOut.com, all rights reserved.
SpeakOut.com 1225 I Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005 | 202-777-3100 | Fax 202-842-5822
info@speakoutfoundation.com
| Advertising information | Privacy and Use Policies