SpeakOut.com
 
Home News Opinion Issues Politics TakeAction Forum Links
 
Send This Article to a Friend    Printer-Friendly Version   

Should Teenagers Be Taught Sex Education Over Abstinence?

by Jenny Murphy
Saturday, January 29, 2000

While some the nation's schools combine pro-abstinence lessons with information about contraception and safe sex, about one-third of schools opt for abstinence-only programs. Recent studies indicate that sex education programs in schools often emphasize abstinence from sexual activity as the only safe and moral choice for teenagers.

On One Hand...

A majority of schools teach that abstinence is the preferable option for teenagers, but also offer information about birth control options and disease transmission. Education decisions should be driven by empirical evidence rather than political ideology. No conclusive studies have shown that abstinence-only education prevents teens from engaging in sexual activity at an early age.

The spread of disease among teenagers and teen pregnancy are public health issues that will only worsen if these issues are left out of sex education classes.

On the Other Hand...

Teenagers should be taught that abstinence is the only sure protection against pregnancy and STDs. Discussion of contraception options conveys the message that pre-marital sex is acceptable, and it encourages teenagers to become sexually active at an earlier age.

Abstinence-only programs also teach the importance of self-control and responsibility, and promote the development of a value system about sex.

  • The welfare reform legislation signed into law in 1996 designated $250 million over five years for abstinence-only programs in schools, and the law specifies that school districts that accept these funds cannot include information about contraception in their sexual education programs.

  • A 1997 report from the Institute of Medicine said there are 3 million new cases of sexually transmitted diseases among teenagers annually.

  • Among young girls, 8 in 10 are still sexually inexperienced at age fifteen, while 7 in 10 boys are inexperience at the same age.

  • Teenage women's contraceptive use at first intercourse rose from 48 percent to 65 percent during the 1980s, almost entirely because of a doubling in condom use. By 1995, use at first intercourse reached 78 percent, with 2/3 of it condom use.

  • The overall U.S. teenage pregnancy rate declined 17 percent between 1990 and 1996, from 117 pregnancies per 1,000 women aged 15-19 to 97 per 1,000.

National Institute of Medicine, Alan Guttmacher Institute

 Surveys
 
 Agree
Abstinence-only programs ignore reality and contribute to the problems of teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases among teens. Sex education in schools should provide information about contraception, safe sex, and abstinence.
 Disagree
Abstinence should be taught to teens, to the exclusion of all other methods of birth control and STD protection, because it is the only 100 percent effective method. Providing teens with information about contraception promotes the message that premarital sex is acceptable behavior.
 Documents
Abstinence Promotion and the Provision of Information About Contraception in Public School District Sexuality Education Policies
The Politics of Sex Education
 Features
The Failure of Sex Education
 Organizations
The Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States
 Perspectives
Abstinence: Why Sex is Worth the Wait?
Preventing Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Adolescents: A Clash of Ideology and Science
 

Home | News | Opinion | Issues | Politics | TakeAction | Forum
Reproduction of material from any SpeakOut.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. Copyright © 2000 SpeakOut.com, all rights reserved.
SpeakOut.com 1225 I Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005 | 202-777-3100 | Fax 202-842-5822
info@speakoutfoundation.com
| Advertising information | Privacy and Use Policies